fuws.cc Fuws.cc

   
网址跳转中..请稍候

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Fuws.cc?

• Fuws.cc ranks #119,392 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Fuws.cc?

0.0003877% of global Internet users visit Fuws.cc

How many people visit Fuws.cc each day?

• Fuws.cc receives approximately 19.1K visitors and 23,293 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fuws.cc receive most of its visitors from?

• Fuws.cc is mostly visited by people located in China,Taiwan,Hong Kong.

How much Fuws.cc can earn?

• Fuws.cc should earn about $4.14/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fuws.cc estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fuws.cc is $3,656.12.

What IP addresses does Fuws.cc resolve to?

• Fuws.cc resolves to the IP addresses 74.118.138.166.

Where are Fuws.cc servers located in?

• Fuws.cc has servers located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States.

fuws.cc Profile

Title:网址跳转中..请稍候

What technologies does fuws.cc use?

These are the technologies used at fuws.cc. fuws.cc has a total of 1 technologies installed in 1 different categories.

fuws.cc Traffic Analysis

Fuws.cc is ranked #119,392 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 19.1K visitors daily, generating a total of 23.3K pageviews. This equates to about 579.1K monthly visitors. Fuws.cc traffic has increased by 101.57% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors19.1K
157.81%
Monthly Visits579.1K
101.57%
Pages per Visit1.22
13.48%
Visit duration00:23
56.63%
Bounce Rate84.36%
3.27%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
19,112
Monthly Visits:
579,094
Pages per Visit:
1.22
Daily Pageviews:
23,293
Avg. visit duration:
00:23
Bounce rate:
84.36%
Global Reach:
0.0003877%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
143,417
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
78,122
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
567,670
HypeRank:
119,392
SimilarWeb Rank:
119,392
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
64.09%
Referral:
34.47%
Search:
1.44%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
28.26%
Mobile:
71.74%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

428.9K
DEC
287.3K
JAN
579.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
China 84.98%
 
Taiwan 8.51%
 
Hong Kong 5.99%
 
Singapore 0.35%
 
Japan 0.18%

Which sites are competitors to fuws.cc?

Websites similar to fuws.cc are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
ikanmh.top
Compare >30.8K
manhala.com
Compare >871
Last update was 2 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fuws.cc in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
4

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fuws.cc
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $4.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $124.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3.7K.

How much would fuws.cc make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.14
Monthly Revenue:
$124.20
Yearly Revenue:
$1,511.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
China 19,794$1.98
 
Hong Kong 1,394$1.53
 
Taiwan 1,982$0.46
 
Singapore 82$0.15
 
Japan 41$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.53
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$15.86
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$192.96
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
3,055
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
91,641
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,114,971

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
China 2,573$0.26
 
Hong Kong 139$0.15
 
Taiwan 317$0.07
 
Singapore 24$0.04
 
Japan 1$0.00

How much is fuws.cc worth?

Website Value:
$3.7K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fuws.cc
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fuws.cc
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fuws.cc
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fuws.cc hosted?

Fuws.cc may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
74.118.138.166
ASN:
AS20326 
ISP:
TeraSwitch Networks Inc. 
Server Location:
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania, PA
15212
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 74.118.138.166

How fast does fuws.cc load?

The average loading time of fuws.cc is 84 ms. The Desktop speed index is 89 and mobile speed index is 84.
Average Load Time:
84 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

89
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)101ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)213ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)412ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)64ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)750ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 2.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Tasks  
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.
Max Potential First Input Delay 110 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Avoid long main-thread tasks  
Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay. Learn how to avoid long main-thread tasks
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Diagnostics  
Collection of useful page vitals.
Minimizes main-thread work  
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to minimize main-thread work
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 130 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
JavaScript execution time  
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)542ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)252ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 65% 26% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 26% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)268ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)613ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)183ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 77% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)896ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 8.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 130 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 160 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 2.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Largest Contentful Paint 3.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Does fuws.cc use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fuws.cc are reduced by 48%.
fuws.cc use gzip compression.
Original size: 1.71 KB
Compressed size: 902 B
File reduced by: 854 B (48%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. fuws.cc has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fuws.cc supports HTTPS.
 fuws.cc supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fuws.cc
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Jan 24 00:24:13 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 24 00:24:12 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fuws.cc does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:54:02 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Server: cdn
X-Cache-Status: MISS
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
CNAME pznk8hr6.lee9998.com 12
NS a.share-dns.com 172752
NS b.share-dns.net 172752
HINFO 3789

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on November 24, 2024 and will expire on November 24, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gname.com Pte. Ltd.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 23, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-11-24
Domain Expires:
2025-11-24
Domain Updated:
2025-03-23
Domain Age:
4 months 4 days
Domain Registrar:
Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Domain Owner:
Redacted for privacy
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: FUWS.CC
Registry Domain ID: 203382775_DOMAIN_CC-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gname.com
Registrar URL: www.gname.com
Updated Date: 2025-03-23T05:15:05Z
Creation Date: 2024-11-24T02:10:49Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-11-24T02:10:49Z
Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Registrar IANA ID: 1923
Reseller:
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +65.31581931
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Name: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Organization: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Street: Redacted for privacy
Registrant City: Redacted for privacy
Registrant State/Province: TAIPEI
Registrant Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Country: TW,CN
Registrant Phone: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Fax: Redacted for privacy
Registrant Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=registrant&domain=FUWS.CC
Admin Name: Redacted for privacy
Admin Organization: Redacted for privacy
Admin Street: Redacted for privacy
Admin City: Redacted for privacy
Admin State/Province: Redacted for privacy
Admin Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Admin Country: Redacted for privacy
Admin Phone: Redacted for privacy
Admin Fax: Redacted for privacy
Admin Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=admin&domain=FUWS.CC
Tech Name: Redacted for privacy
Tech Organization: Redacted for privacy
Tech Street: Redacted for privacy
Tech City: Redacted for privacy
Tech State/Province: Redacted for privacy
Tech Postal Code: Redacted for privacy
Tech Country: Redacted for privacy
Tech Phone: Redacted for privacy
Tech Fax: Redacted for privacy
Tech Email: https://rdap.gname.com/extra/contact?type=technical&domain=FUWS.CC
Name Server: A.SHARE-DNS.COM
Name Server: B.SHARE-DNS.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-23T05:15:05Z